Health News and Issues

Fitness & Excercise

Natural Health

Natural Health

Nutrition & Diet

Nutrition & Diet

Whats The Difference Involving Fish Oil And Krill Oil

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

You will find reports saying that there's a new omega 3 supplement in town that will challenge the highly respected oil supplement - that new product is called antarctic krill oil. But could there be really much difference? Let us check more details on the fish oil vs. krill oil argument and know the facts.

It has already proven its prowess as a good supplement. In hopes to make the most out of the health rewards that Fish Oil will give, scientific studies have been performed to come up with supplements that are more efficient that will give more omega 3.

Not too long ago, it's been found that there might just be an alternate source that will give as much as Fish Oil can give. This has lead some to imply krill oil is some kind of miracle, while there are other people saying that it is just a marketing stunt to market this latest fad.

Krill and Fish oil - what they can do

Krill and Fish Oil are regarded as probably help reduce inflammation, support heart health and also cardiovascular health, it can also help improve mood levels, encourage fat reduction plus much more. These benefits are all because of omega 3 fatty acids. Krill Oil and Fish Oil are both natural supplements Which can be safely taken everyday without any unwanted side effects.

Does krill oil have more antioxidants?

What's notable in krill oil that makes a lot of people think that it might be better than fish oil is that it is made up of more antioxidants than some but not all brands of fish. One example of antioxidant present in krill oil is the astaxanthin which can be readily absorbed into the body easily. But, there are some fish oil that contain added astaxanthin and deliver more of it than krill oil does. Thus,there are brands of oils are better than krill if you use this measurement of astaxanthin antioxidants.

Krill oil May Contain Additional Vitamins A and D

Aside from its antioxidant content, krill supplements are also found to contain vitamins A and D which are absent in fish oil. This could be bad or good, depending on whether you are already taking a multivitamin that already contains enough vitamin A and D. There are doctors that advices not to take too much Vitamin A or D, so consult your doctor how much Vitamin A or D is good for you.

In spite of the new fad, many people still seem to stick with fish oil supplements. Here are some reasons why:

The possibility of krill extinction

Although Omega 3 fatty acid health benefits have already been established, krill hasn't been as thoroughly researched as fish oil. More importantly, there's some people believing that krill will also be included in the listing of species that are already decreasing in numbers - consuming them and producing them for oil might actually not be good for the environment. Krills are also of whales so the question arises: are we taking away food from endangered whales?

Krill oil is pricey

Presently, there are only some good health companies who manufacture krill oil. Currently, krill oil product generally cosst more than fish oil. This means you are going to shell out extra money on a product that has fewer studies to demonstrate whether it really gives health advantages equal to fish oil.

Krill oil has all the vital omega 3 fatty acids

While Fish oil is said to provide you with huge levels of omega 3 fatty acids, krill oil remains superior regarding levels of important omega 3 acids like EPA and DFA. What this mean is the specific benefits plus the desired effects might probably be better acquired with krill oil.

The verdict between Fish Oil and Krill Oil

Base on the debate above, paying more for krill oil maybe great for consumers. This means that there are maybe some concerns about taking krill oil supplements for now, you can maybe pay more to buy krill oil supplements, probably take food away from endangered whales, getting too mmuch vitamin A as well as much vitamin A and D. But the choice is still yours whether you want to stick with proven and tested fish oil until more studies are performed on krill oil.

It is also important to remember that there are also fish oil supplements now, have added astaxanthin antioxidants and as a result they've got this ingredient just like krill oil does. Consequently the same amount of antioxidants just like krill oil has.

Remember that these statements aren't health advice and have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Fish oil supplements aren't meant to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate or prevent any disease.

Reasons why krill oil is great for your health

Thursday, October 21, 2010

It is a well known misconception that all fats that we eat are harmful for your body. This is definitely not true because there are some fats that are very good for your body. One category of fat that is beneficial for your body is the Omega3 fatty acids. Always bear in mind that foods rich in Omega 3 should form a part of our diet.

Krill Oil Benefits List

1. Maintain healthy cholesterol levels
2. Ease premenstrual syndrome and menstrual cramps
3. Combats signs of aging
4. protect cell membranes
5. supports liver function
6. supports memory plus learning
7. bolster immune system
8. important for healthy skin

What are Krills?

Krills are shrimp-like animals of the sea. Krills are near the base of the food chain, serving as nutrition to many other marine creatures. Did you know that even the great whale feed on krills?

Human consumption of krills are not new. You just haven't heard of it. Krills are familiar delicacy in Japan probably even before 19th century. However, there a lot of krill types as there are fish. Remember that not all kinds of krills are to our body though.

This type of krill oil that have been tested and proven to be beneficial to us and that is what you call antarctic krill oil. Antarctic krill oil has many of health benefits which I will mention below. But for the meantime, let's investigate the alternatives!

Krill Oil and Fish Oil Comparison

People have been taking fish oil for quite some time now due to the health benefits that it promises. But there are many different types of fish which can end up in the production of fish oil & we're coming to discover out as time goes on that there may be certain kinds of fish oils which are better for the body than others. Fish oil are really beneficial to your health and wellness because it has 2 vital omega-3 fats to our well-being - the DHA & EPA. DHA & EPA are known to enhance healthy heart also supports your immune system.

Unlike krill, fish oil has scarcely any antioxidant in it. The problem with thisis, as omega-3 fats consumption increased, you need to raise your consumption of antioxidants too! The reason why you need to do this is because fish oil is very perishable. Antioxidants are needed to prevent fish oil from oxidizing and cause more damage than good.

Krill oil on the other hand, has not only both DHA and EPA but also strong antioxidants property. Therefore you do not need to be anxious regarding increasing your intake of antioxidants!

What's Krill Oil?

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Krill are small crustaceans, much like shrimp, which grow to be from one to six centimeters lengthy. They reside along the oceans flooring, and feed mostly on phytoplankton. Eaten by a big variety of wildlife such as whales, seals, penguins, squid, and fish or all types, these creatures are pretty much on the bottom with the meals chain.

Most commercial kind krill fishing is done in the southern portions of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Ocean, too as the northern part of Pacific Ocean, around the coasts of Japan and Canada. The fisherman catch these wildlife to use them in aquaculture and aquarium feeds, for sport fishing, or for meals. If krill is used for food in Japan it's known as okiami.

The oil that's naturally discovered in these creatures is extracted and offered as a dietary supplement. The cause for this is due towards the reality that it's very higher in omega 3 fatty acids. It also consists of an antioxidant which is known as astaxanthin. The algae that is eaten by krill produces the vibrant red pigment, astaxanthin which makes krill, shrimp, lobster and other crustaceans their pinkish color.

These anti-oxidants assist to shield the cells within our body from some thing called 'free radicals'. Free radicals are unstable substances which several think contributes to a number of various persistent illnesses. Astaxanthin crosses the blood to brain barrier, which can make most researchers think that it may shield the eyes, mind, and central nervous system from the damage brought on by totally free radicals. Other anti-oxidants do not cross this barrier.

People ingest krill oil for the exact same uses that they would ingest flax oils, fish oils, or other omega 3 fatty acids. Fish oil can occasionally trigger a fishy burp or aftertaste, that is a recognized after effect if fish oil. Krill oil also has a larger amount of astaxanthin than fish oils do. Its utilized for several different well being reasons which consist of:

• Decreasing Cholesterol- Inside a study done on the effects of krill oil on high cholesterol, 120 individuals were offered both krill oil, fish oil, or a placebo. The ones who ingested krill oil showed a reduction of 34% in LDL or 'bad' cholesterol, and an increase of 43.5% in HDL or 'good' cholesterol in comparison to those that took a placebo. Those who took krill oil also acquired a lowered triglyceride count. The ones who took the fish oil confirmed a reduction of LDL cholesterol by 4.6% compared to the placebo, and and increase in HDL by 4.2%.

• Premenstrual Syndrome or PMS- Research shows that krill oil may help wit the symptoms of PMS, by further research is nonetheless being conducted.

• Arthritis-According to research posted within the 'Journal with the American College of Nutrition' when people got 300 mg each day of krill oil in comparison with a placebo, those who took krill oil showed efficient outcomes in relieving arthritis pain, irritation, along with other signs.

As far as aspect effects are concerned, there are really very couple of. Of course, those with allergy symptoms to seafood ought to not ingest these oil. People who have bleeding disorder are advised to speak having a doctor and be supervised by a professional well being professional prior to using krill oil. It is not recommended to use it with blood thinners such as aspirin, warfarin, heparin, clopidogrel, or NSAIDS this kind of as ibuprofen, or naproxen should not use krill oil without checking with their medical doctors. The exact same goes for gingko bilobo and garlic. Side results may include looser stools and indigestion.

Different Types of Treadmills For Exercise

Monday, July 5, 2010

Walking, jogging or running can be a very fun way to do exercise, but for many who live in urban and crowded areas, going out armed with water bottle, portable music player, towel, running shoes and lots of energy sometimes can't be an option, hoping that the weather keeps holding. But alas, it happens more often that not, that it is not possible at all to exercise outdoors.

A good alternative is to get a treadmill, but the offer out in the market can be overwhelming, and for someone who is new to them, it can be a real challenge to choose the right one, since they all look the same, but there are many different models and types out there, literally hundreds of brands and models, all of them competing among themselves to gain more fans, offering diverse functions, materials, colors, tactile screens or even cardiac monitors for those who are also worried about their health.

The range varies from the budge, home designed manual treadmills to the big commercial ones, intended to be used in gyms or doctor practices.

The simplest ones have no motor, those designed for homes with little available space, since they can be folded to be stored under the bed or inside a cabinet. They are usually one of the cheapest kind of treadmills found in the market, but unfortunately, the durability of this kind of treadmill is rather limited and if they are used too roughly, they may tend to break down after a couple of months. These are recommended for the causal user, and not for somebody planning to use it every day for many hours each time. These are perfect for people who are just beginning and want to try out before deciding to go to the next step in home-training.

There are treadmills intended for home use equipped with a motor, and they can also be found in a multitude of models and with more or less functions programmed in them. They are built in a more stable frame, but they are also bulkier and use up more space, since very few of these can be stored away.

If the user is serious about exercising, these kinds of treadmills have different programs for more specific ends, copied from those used professionally in gyms: cardiovascular training, condition training, or simple weight loss. Whether these built in functions will work for everyone, depends on the user.

For those who are planning to use it constantly, maybe the best option could be a commercial treadmill. There are simple, yet robust and equipped with a high-powered motor, and those with tactile screens, media players and cardiovascular monitors. It all depends on the particular use intended for it, and of course, the budget available.

The price and quality of the treadmill can vary and the person interested in buying one for his/her personal use, should first consider how often will be using it and what kind of training is planning to do. Depending on the quality and the price, will also depend the guarantee offered by the vendor, which can vary from model to model and it should be a detail to consider before finally buying a treadmill.

from ezinearticles.com

Stomach wraps more effective approach to treat severe acid reflux

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

acid refluxWashington, Mar 17 (ANI): For treatment of severe acid reflux, stomach wrap operations could be a more effective option than acid suppression tablets, according to a new Cochrane Systematic Review.

The study shows a more pronounced improvement in symptoms shortly after surgery than with drug treatment.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common chronic disease in which acid reflux causes heartburn, acid regurgitation, vomiting and difficulty swallowing.

GORD can be treated by changes to diet and acid suppression tablets, but in the most severe cases, doctors go for a surgical operation called a fundoplication, which involves wrapping part of the stomach around the lower part of the gullet.

However, it is not certain whether this procedure is more effective than medication.

The authors reviewed data from four trials, which together involved 1232 participants.

And their conclusions relate to findings from follow-up up to one year after treatment.

They found that fundoplication operations performed by keyhole surgery were more effective at reducing the symptoms of GORD over this timescale, but that there was little data available to indicate potential benefits over longer timescales.

"There is evidence to suggest that, at least in the short to medium term, surgery is more effective than tablets for treatment of GORD. But surgery does carry a risk and whether this is outweighed by the benefits in the long term is still not certain," said lead researcher Samantha Wileman of the Health Services Research Unit at the University of Aberdeen in the UK.

"Previous research, prior to the development of keyhole surgery for GORD, has suggested that the benefits of surgery for GORD are not sustained over time, highlighting the importance for future keyhole fundoplication studies to include longer term follow-up. We also need to know more about the clinical and cost implications of long term medication versus surgery," said Wileman. (ANI)

Useful Remedies For Acid Reflux

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

acid refluxHealth factors as well as eating habits can at times lead to several uncomfortable health conditions such as Acid reflux.

Acid reflux a uncomfortable condition that can lead to various health conditions. For example, people who usually suffer from acid reflux are more prone to develope esophageal cancers than those who dont usually suffer from it. The pain from the constant and persistent acid reflux can be debilitating whenever it attacks.

This article aims to help and give information on useful remedies for acid reflux. Listed here are some remedies that you can try to help you with your acid reflux.

Atacids - are one of the oldest and most popular remedies for acid reflux. It is usually chewable which neutralize the acids in your stomach. Although antacids are one of the most fastest acting remedy for acid reflux but also the most temporary. Calcium carbonate is usually the active ingredient of antacids but lately aluminum hydroxide is becoming a popular choice compare to antacid. More people prefer the latter one because it tastes better, upsets their stomach less, and works just as well as calcium carbonate.

Another remedies for acid reflux that are gaining popularity are acid reducers. Like antacids, acid reducers are also sold over the counter. Although the effect of acid reducers is slower compare to other remedies, you can instantly feel the relief it can give once it starts to kick in. Acid reducers can even give you hours of relief from heartburn.

On the other hand, here are some non-drug remedies that you can try for your acid reflux. It is also a good idea to find non-pharmaceutical options you may have in fighting acid reflux. Here are some non-pharmaceutical remedies or practices that you can do that don’t require taking a pill and may be enough in preventing any heartburn you are having.

* Elevating your bed
* Avoiding large or greasy meals
* Waiting at least three hours before lying down after eating

Health Care Reform and the Courts

Thursday, May 20, 2010

health careThe number of states jointly suing to overturn the new health care reform law on constitutional grounds swelled to 20 last week. It is the latest example of conservatives’ determination to thwart reforms that will do enormous good — and the latest reminder that politicians will continue to posture and demagogue the issue through the November elections and beyond.

The lawsuit, filed by state attorneys general and governors, all but one a Republican, seeks to overturn two central elements of the law: a mandate that virtually everyone obtain insurance or pay a penalty; and a big expansion of Medicaid, the state-federal insurance program that covers the poorest Americans. The suit contends Congress has no constitutional power to compel people to make purchases from a private company and that the required expansion of Medicaid is an “unprecedented encroachment” on the sovereignty of states.

Not surprising, many of the officials behind these suits are running for re-election or higher office. The lead plaintiff, Florida’s attorney general, Bill McCollum, is seeking the Republican nomination for governor. His campaign Web site urges voters to tell Washington that “expensive big-government health care is a violation of our nation’s Constitution and we won’t stand for it.”

The Obama administration has yet to file a response. It has responded to private litigation filed in a Federal District Court in Michigan by the Thomas More Law Center, a conservative Christian nonprofit law firm, and four individuals.

The group’s brief — which pointedly named Barack Hussein Obama as a defendant — contends it will be a hardship for the plaintiffs to buy insurance they don’t want or pay monetary penalties. It charges that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution by requiring, for the first time, that people buy something simply because they reside legally in the country.

The Justice Department first challenged the timing of the suits. It pointed out that the plaintiffs have filed suit “four years before the provision they challenge takes effect, demonstrate no current injury, and merely speculate whether the law will harm them once it is in force.”

The department argued that Congress can impose and enforce the mandate under its powers to regulate interstate commerce and to tax and spend to provide for the general welfare.

The law center had argued that people who refuse to buy insurance are not engaging in activity that affects interstate commerce, but choosing not to engage in such activity. The Justice Department replied that even refusals to buy insurance can, in the aggregate, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

If people without insurance need costly medical care and can’t pay, they typically get cared for anyway. The cost is shifted to hospitals, which in turn shift some of the costs to privately insured patients and to taxpayers who help subsidize the hardest hit hospitals.

Most important, a mandate is deemed essential to the effective functioning of individual health insurance markets that are clearly part of interstate commerce. If the healthiest people are allowed to opt out, the average premiums will escalate and make insurance increasingly unaffordable for everyone. These are novel but persuasive arguments that deserve deference from the courts.

The Justice Department also contended that Congress has the power to raise taxes for the general welfare and that the penalty for not buying insurance is effectively a tax and will generate revenues to help support the reform effort.

The states’ lawsuit raises similar arguments against the mandate and also contends the reform law is an encroachment on state sovereignty because it requires states to greatly expand Medicaid programs.

Congress has long required states to cover specified groups of people up to specified levels of income. Extending those requirements is consistent, and is in no way an “unprecedented” encroachment on state affairs.

We believe the reform law has been carefully framed to stay within constitutional bounds. We are certain it will contribute to the nation’s overall welfare by covering tens of millions of uninsured Americans and taking steps to improve the quality and lower the cost of medical care. We hope these suits stumble over procedural hurdles. If they go forward the courts should rule against the states and allow the reforms to proceed.

source: The New York Times
 

2009 ·Healthy Bites by TNB